Post by adyjdy on Jan 21, 2006 2:20:25 GMT -5
This is a continuing discussion that began in "Every Father's Daughter..." under "Rate this episode." Season 4 spoilers abound!
I'm not saying in any way shape or form that David is blameless, not by a LONG shot. In fact, I agree with nearly everything you say about him, with a few exceptions that I won't get into right now.
My inability to--what's the right word here--move past being displeased with Maddie has nothing to do with her leaving for Chicago. I'm not really even that bothered by her prohibiting contact with David. (In theory. As a viewer, it sucked!) I don’t even feel she really betrayed David by marrying Walter. All these I can understand and/or forgive.
What I can't get passed, no matter how much I try are her reasons for telling David the baby is not his.
A number of explanations have been given over the years to mitigate her behavior, and as much as I want to believe them--and I really want to--I can't see the logic in any of them.
1. Some say she knows the baby is David's subconciously, but convinces herself out of pain, desperation, denial that it isn't his. I can understand that for a month or two knowing M has serious issues, especially when it comes to D. But at what point does this “subconscious denial” crap stop being a reasonable justification and start being just another excuse for childish, even cruel behavior?
Denying her feelings for David to him and herself is one thing, but the baby or its paternity are not “feelings.” They’re not “dreams” that she can wake up from. They’re not “ideas” that she can kick around. They are realities. While this may well be what Maddie did, I cannot help but want to grab her by her fluffy blond head and say, “Grow up!”
2. Some say she told D the baby was Sam’s because by that time she was married to Walter and it didn’t matter whose genes the baby had, Walter would act as the baby’s father. While it MAY be true that it didn’t matter to Walter and didn’t matter to her, she had to know it would matter to David. In other words, she just plain lied. And why? To keep from hurting David? If she cared about doing that, she wouldn’t have married Walter in the first place. To protect her child by giving him a better life with a better father (Walter)? If she really believed that, why didn’t she stay married to him. That really only leaves one possible reason. She lied to protect herself, knowing the lie would hurt David, and knowing it was, in fact, a lie.
3. It is said that maybe her doctor told her that the baby was Sam’s. While this is the kindest explanation, there is a hair in my bubble gum. In "Tracks of My Tears" M says she is a little less than 5 months along, and it is made very clear that she was in Chicago for 4.5 months. She's no doctor--fine--but it doesn't take a medical degree to figure that one out. (I don’t know why David didn’t call her on it.) I wish, oh how I wish, I could believe that she really believed it was Sam's baby, but for her to think that she would have to be pretty stupid, and she’s not. This little dilemma has been gnawing at the back of my brain since the show's original run. I just don’t know how she could honestly believe this.
To quote a famous man, “I’m not here to tell you that your daughter is a bad guy.” Plenty of crappy behavior to go around, certainly. For me, Maddie just went over the line with this incident, and I find myself constantly on the look out for an explanation of her behavior that I can both believe and live with.
Have any?
I know that much of my distrust of her could have been alleviated by a few scenes that showed things from her point of view in Season 4, but what I actually saw was not pretty, and I can’t pretend to see it otherwise, even if I really want to.
I'm not saying in any way shape or form that David is blameless, not by a LONG shot. In fact, I agree with nearly everything you say about him, with a few exceptions that I won't get into right now.
My inability to--what's the right word here--move past being displeased with Maddie has nothing to do with her leaving for Chicago. I'm not really even that bothered by her prohibiting contact with David. (In theory. As a viewer, it sucked!) I don’t even feel she really betrayed David by marrying Walter. All these I can understand and/or forgive.
What I can't get passed, no matter how much I try are her reasons for telling David the baby is not his.
A number of explanations have been given over the years to mitigate her behavior, and as much as I want to believe them--and I really want to--I can't see the logic in any of them.
1. Some say she knows the baby is David's subconciously, but convinces herself out of pain, desperation, denial that it isn't his. I can understand that for a month or two knowing M has serious issues, especially when it comes to D. But at what point does this “subconscious denial” crap stop being a reasonable justification and start being just another excuse for childish, even cruel behavior?
Denying her feelings for David to him and herself is one thing, but the baby or its paternity are not “feelings.” They’re not “dreams” that she can wake up from. They’re not “ideas” that she can kick around. They are realities. While this may well be what Maddie did, I cannot help but want to grab her by her fluffy blond head and say, “Grow up!”
2. Some say she told D the baby was Sam’s because by that time she was married to Walter and it didn’t matter whose genes the baby had, Walter would act as the baby’s father. While it MAY be true that it didn’t matter to Walter and didn’t matter to her, she had to know it would matter to David. In other words, she just plain lied. And why? To keep from hurting David? If she cared about doing that, she wouldn’t have married Walter in the first place. To protect her child by giving him a better life with a better father (Walter)? If she really believed that, why didn’t she stay married to him. That really only leaves one possible reason. She lied to protect herself, knowing the lie would hurt David, and knowing it was, in fact, a lie.
3. It is said that maybe her doctor told her that the baby was Sam’s. While this is the kindest explanation, there is a hair in my bubble gum. In "Tracks of My Tears" M says she is a little less than 5 months along, and it is made very clear that she was in Chicago for 4.5 months. She's no doctor--fine--but it doesn't take a medical degree to figure that one out. (I don’t know why David didn’t call her on it.) I wish, oh how I wish, I could believe that she really believed it was Sam's baby, but for her to think that she would have to be pretty stupid, and she’s not. This little dilemma has been gnawing at the back of my brain since the show's original run. I just don’t know how she could honestly believe this.
To quote a famous man, “I’m not here to tell you that your daughter is a bad guy.” Plenty of crappy behavior to go around, certainly. For me, Maddie just went over the line with this incident, and I find myself constantly on the look out for an explanation of her behavior that I can both believe and live with.
Have any?
I know that much of my distrust of her could have been alleviated by a few scenes that showed things from her point of view in Season 4, but what I actually saw was not pretty, and I can’t pretend to see it otherwise, even if I really want to.